The Good Earth: Wang Lung - A Man Of Determination And Loyalty :: essays research papers

The Good Earth: Wang Lung - A Man of Determination and Loyalty Pearl S. Buck shows her readers the many faces of Wang Lung in her book, The Good Earth. Wang Lung is a rice farmer who gains all his wealth through the land. He struggles to move from poverty to a well respected wealthy man. Wang Lungs character portrays a man's unselfishness, determination, and loyalty towards his family and friends.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Wang Lung's caring and generous nature towards his family and friends make him a well-liked person. During the drought Wang Lung feeds the family members first and leaves what little is left for himself. Though it is hard, Wang Lung manages to survive the drought. He feeds the family small portions of rice which are left over from the season. When the food runs out and the furniture and equipment are sold, Wang Lung decides to make a harsh decision. He decides to lock up and move south. There he hopes to find food and money for his family. After a 100 mile train ride, they end up in the south. Wang Lung is delighted to find rice for only a penny. While Wang Lung uses the ricksha to make money for rice, the family eats and begins to regain strength. When all is well, Wang Lung returns home to start his life all over.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Also during the drought Wang Lung spares food and money for his uncle, uncles's wife and their son. The uncle is a poor old gambler who would rather gamble his money away than to spend it on his family. During the drought he shows up in Wang Lung's fields begging for money. At first Wang Lung refuses to dish out money to his uncle. After a time of arguementing Wang Lung finally gives in. He states It is cutting my flesh out to give to him and for nothing except that we are of a blood.(46) Wang Lung is upset that he had to give money to his uncle. Wang Lung didn't have to give to his uncle, but by doing so he kept peace with his him.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Wang Lung's persistence to succeed carries him to a higher level in life. With such an attitude he is determined to regain his wealth after the drought. On the way home from down south, Wang Lung used the gold he had taken from the man in the Great House to buy things for the land. He bought seeds to plant and a new beast to plow the fields. Wang Lung figures this will give him what he

Computer and I :: Personal Narrative Writing

Computer and I Well, what can I say about the long history that computers and I have had. I can hardly remember a time when a computer was not part of my life. Ever since I was in elementary school I can remember going to the computer labs to learn all about computers. Back in the day though; this was fun stuff, all you did was go to the labs for a couple of hours and play computer games. I remember playing countless hours of Oregon Trail, but that also has to do with the fact that to play one games takes the longest time. The next step in my history with computers was the word processor. This was something my sister asked for on her birthday. The word processor days were not that bad. It was just like using a typewriter but being able to erase your mistakes. It was also interesting because if you wanted to you could switch it to typewriter mode and it would type without using the computer screen and so it was just like using an old typewriter. Some people might think that a word processor might be a little primitive but it is not. You could do many things with it, why everything the word processor programs have on your computer it used to have. You could do spreadsheet and most of the things that Microsoft programs can do now. Later on; my family purchased a computer, here is where things got kind of hard but better at the same time. Since I was young when we got it there was no need for me to be messing with the complicated things. All I ever did on it was use it for pure entertainment. Computers were fun then; but only when you where playing games. Soon came the years when I actually had to sit down and write a paper for class.

Analysis Of Noun Phrase In English And Vietnamese Education Essay

Noun phrases every bit good as other phrases play an of import function in get the hanging any linguistic communication. Without noun phrase, there would hold no agents, no patients, and no receivers. Additionally, no affair how broad our vocabulary may be, a individual word is frequently deficient in showing our thought.. A incompatible analysis between English and Vietnamese is necessary and interesting for learning and analyzing. Almost every linguistic communication has noun phrases, nevertheless, despite holding the same basic construction, they have some differences..This survey aims to research internal and external construction of English and Vietnamese noun phrases so make a comparing between two sorts of NP every bit good as suggest some teaching deductions. I hope through this assignment, both I and the readers will larn something helpful which can use to English instruction and acquisition.Noun phrase in EnglishDefinitions:Le ( 2002 ) defined noun phrase ( NP ) as a group of words get downing with a noun and working appositional. This NP frequently goes right earlier or right after the noun it expresses. Ex-husband: A victim of war, he hated the sight of soldiers. ( A victim of war = he ) Harmonizing to L.H.Nguyen ( 2004 ) , a NP is a group of words with a noun or pronoun as the chief portion ( the caput ) . In his book â€Å" Analyzing English † , Jackson added some more deal about the caput which is â€Å" the minimum demand for the happening of a noun phrase † . Despite the NP is in simple signifier such as â€Å" pupils † or in complex signifier such as â€Å" the narrative about the miss who used to populate at that place † , it must hold a noun or pronoun showing the chief thought.Structure:Basically, a noun phrase consists of 3 chief parts: Pre – Alteration, Head, Post – Alteration. But in some complex NPs, we can see that the Pre – Alteration may incorporate other elements. Based on the theory of NP in the book â€Å" Analyzing English † by Howard Jackson, we have a elaborate expression of NP as followers:Pre – AlterationHeadPost – AlterationPre – clincher ( A ) Identifiers ( B ) Numeral/Quantifier ( C ) Adjectives ( D ) Noun qualifier ( Tocopherol ) N/pro ( F ) Relative clauses, infinite clause, prepositional phrase, adjectives, adverbs. ( G ) Table 1: The construction of a NP in English Now, we will travel into inside informations of the construction of a NP.Pre – AlterationThis portion fundamentally has 5 elements as shown in the above tabular array. The first component is pre-determiners. They are a little group of words which may happen before the identifier in a NP. They besides have quantifier mention ( all, both, half, aˆÂ ¦ ) ; fraction numbers ( one-third, aˆÂ ¦ ) . Following component is identifiers. This component includes articles ( a, an, the ) ; demonstrative ( this, that, these, those ) ; genitives ( my, your, his, aˆÂ ¦ ) . But there is one thing we should pay attending. In any NP, merely merely one identifier may happen, it means that articles, demonstrative and genitives are reciprocally sole. We ca n't state â€Å" that my house † but if we use â€Å" of-phrase † with the genitive pronoun, we can show that NP in another manner â€Å" that book of mine † . In some NPs such as â€Å" five cats † , â€Å" several books † , the pre – alteration here is numerical ( five ) or quantifier ( several ) . Besides, sometimes, we can see the combination of these two elements in some NPs. The frequent sequences are ordinal numerical ( particularly â€Å" first † and â€Å" last † ) + indefinite quantifier ( eg â€Å" the first few hours † ) , ordinal + cardinal ( eg â€Å" the 2nd five yearss † ) , indefinite quantifier + central numerical, particularly circular figure ( eg â€Å" several thousand people † ) ( Nguyen, 2004, p. 44 ) . To magnify the caput noun in some manner, the following component, adjectives, come after the identifier and numerals/quantifiers. However, in instance that several adjectives co-occur in a NP, there is a regulation for their order.nameSizeformagecoloring materialbeginningsubstancepresent participialcapturing Small unit of ammunition old brown Gallic oaken composing tabular array Table 2: The adjectival order The last component is noun qualifiers which come between the adjectives and the caput noun. As we can see, nouns may work non merely as caputs of NP but besides qualifiers in NP. For illustration, in NP â€Å" a kids book † , â€Å" kids † modifies â€Å" book † and â€Å" a kids book † means a book for kids. Beside 5 basic elements mentioned supra, there is one farther sort of pre-modification that is NP in possessive instance. This sort is marked by an ‘s added to the its concluding word ( eg my friend ‘s bike ) .Head:The most usual sort of caput of NP is noun, but in some NPs such as â€Å" She is my best friend † , the caput may be a pronoun of some sort, normally a personal pronoun ( he, she, youaˆÂ ¦ ) . Similarly, Jacobs ( 1995 ) stated that many NPs in English are individual signifiers dwelling possibly merely of a noun or a pronoun. When the caput is a pronoun, it does n't necessitate any alteration, particularly the pre-modification.Kinds of pronoun operation as the caputExamplesPersonal pronoun He, she, you, they, we, aˆÂ ¦ . Indefinite pronoun Person, something, cipher, aˆÂ ¦ †¦ Possessive pronoun His, her, your, their, aˆÂ ¦ Demonstrative pronoun This, that, aˆÂ ¦ Table 3: Kinds of pronoun operation as the caput of NPPost-modificationThis portion is most often followed by phrases or clauses. Three sorts of phrasal/clausal post-modification we frequently see is: comparative clauses, infinite clauses, and prepositional phrases, sometimes we besides see an adjective or an adverb operation as a post-modifier in NP ( Jackson, p.15 ) . A comparative clause consists of a comparative pronoun ( who, whom, which, that, whose, aˆÂ ¦ ) as a caput, which mentions back to the caput noun of NP. If the comparative pronoun ‘s map is object in the comparative clause, we can exclude that comparative pronoun. Infinite clause is clause normally without topics introduced by a infinite signifier of the verb. That sort of clause include 3 sorts: space clause, present participial clause, past participial. In a NP, prepositional phrase occurs most often working as post-modifier.Some illustrations:All the schools in townA B F G ( prepositional phrase )The last few yearssB C C FDong Bang Shin Ki, my favorite music set.F G ( appositional NP )My noisy 4-year-old white Thai catB name age coloring material FThis arch revenue enhancement aggregator ‘s grabbing manusNP Genitive D FThe Korea history which has merely been published.B D F G ( comparative clause )Something of import to makeF ( indefinite pro ) G ( adjectives ) G ( infinite clause )The miss behind youB F G ( adverb )Two Equus caballuss eating grass.A F G ( infinite clause: present participial )A subject vocal composed by Lee So ManB E F G ( infinite clause: past participial )One-third of the populationA B FNoun phrase in VietnameseDefinitions:Mai, Vu and Hoang ( 2006 ) defined NP ( danh nga »? ) is a phrase in which the noun map as the chief portion. Besides, NP in the theory of Doan, Nguyen, Pham ( 2001 ) is a â€Å" free combination of a noun karyon and one or more than one subsidiary elements â€Å" which can be front elements standing before the nucleus noun or can be end elements standing after the nucleus noun.Structure:As a phrase, NP in Vietnamese besides has three chief parts: Pre-Modification ( Front Element ) , Head ( Nucleus ) , Post-Modification ( End Element ) . More elaborate, harmonizing to Mai et Al. ‘s theory ( pp. 276-280 ) , the construction of NP in Vietnamese can be described as followers: Tat ca nha »?ng Cai con meo A‘en ay ( -3 ) ( -2 ) ( -1 ) Head noun ( 0 ) ( 1 ) ( 2 ) Table 4: The construction of a NP in VietnameseFront elementsAs we can see from the tabular array, the elements in the place ( -3 ) , ( -2 ) and ( -1 ) are called front elements, while the elements standing after the karyon ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) are called end elements. Those elements are placed in a stable manner as shown in the above tabular array. In footings of the front elements, we have three sorts. In the place ( -1 ) , quantifiers such as â€Å" tat ca † , â€Å" tat thay † , â€Å" hat thay † , â€Å" hat ca † , â€Å" ca † , aˆÂ ¦.are used. Those words can happen before: definite numbers: ma »Ã¢â€ž ¢t, hai, Ba, ba »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœn, aˆÂ ¦ Ex-husband: tat ca ba »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœn m? °i sinh vien ( 1 ) corporate nouns: A‘an, lA © , bo , ba »Ã¢â€ž ¢ , nam, aˆÂ ¦ . Ex-husband: ca lA © con trai general nouns: qua? §n, ao, binh, linh, xe ca »Ã¢â€ž ¢ , may moc, aˆÂ ¦ Ex-husband: hat thay may moc Let ‘s pay attending to the quantifiers such as â€Å" tat ca † , â€Å" tat thay † , â€Å" hat thay † , â€Å" hat ca † , â€Å" ca † , aˆÂ ¦.From the illustrations above, we can see that such those quantifiers occur before the caput noun. Now, taking the first illustration, is it right if we say it in such a manner â€Å" ba »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœn m? °i sinh vien tat ca † ? Actually, in footings of grammar, it is right but the significance is different. The NP â€Å" tat ca ba »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœn m? °i sinh vien † means that no pupils are left, but in â€Å" ba »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœn m? °i sinh vien tat ca † , there are some pupils left. So, we can reason that â€Å" tat ca † can stand before and after the caput noun depending on the talker ‘s attending. Diep Quang Ban ( 2000 ) stated that place ( -2 ) is the topographic point taken by word category as followers:Definite numeral/ central figure ( ta »Ã‚ « cha »Ã¢â‚¬ ° sa »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœ l? °a »?ng xac A‘a »Ã¢â‚¬ ¹nh/sa »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœ ta »Ã‚ « )Ma »Ã¢â€ž ¢t, hai, Ba, ba »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœn, m? °a »?i, trA?m aˆÂ ¦.. M? °a »?i con meoEstimate quantifier ( ta »Ã‚ « cha »Ã¢â‚¬ ° sa »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœ pha »?ng A‘a »Ã¢â‚¬ ¹nh )Vai, vai Ba, dA?m, m? °i, aˆÂ ¦ vai Ba khach hangAllocating words ( ta »Ã‚ « ham y phan pha »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœi )Ma »-i, ma »Ã¢â€ž ¢t, ta »Ã‚ «ng, aˆÂ ¦ Ma »-i cong danArticles ( quan ta »Ã‚ « )Nha »?ng, cac, ma »Ã¢â€ž ¢t, .. Nha »?ng bac sA ©Word â€Å" may †May con ga nay Table 5: the place ( -2 ) in a NP in Vietnamese However, we should pay attending that such elements as â€Å" vai, vai Ba, dA?m, aˆÂ ¦ † can non co-exist with the quantifiers such as â€Å" tat ca † , â€Å" tat thay † , â€Å" hat thay † , â€Å" hat ca † , â€Å" ca † in the place ( -3 ) . In footings of the place ( -1 ) , Diep Quang Ban ( 2000 ) stated that it is taken by the deictic word â€Å" cai † ( ta »Ã‚ « cha »Ã¢â‚¬ ° xuat ) in order to stress things mentioned in the caput noun. However, sometimes, â€Å" cai † is replaced by another deictic word such as â€Å" con † in NP â€Å" con ng? °a »?i ay † . In Vietnamese NP, â€Å" cai † occurs before the caput noun and can step in between a numerical ( if there is one ) and the classifier or a step phrase. It may be preceded by other pre-noun qualifiers such as quantifiers, numbers, and articles. It must ever coincide with a classifier as in â€Å" ba cai cua »Ã¢â€ž ¢n len kia â€Å" or â€Å" ba cai thung n? °a »Ã¢â‚¬ ºc nay † . Besides, â€Å" cai † is sometimes mistaken with the homonymic classifier â€Å" cai † , but it ‘s different from classifier cai every bit good as other classifiers in term of distribution and map. When â€Å" ca i † precedes a count noun, the usage of a classifier is obligatory, as shown in ( a ) . However, â€Å" cai † can non be used before the homonymic classifier as shown in ( B ) Ba cai cua »Ã¢â€ž ¢n len ( correct ) Ba cai cai chen ( incorrect ) Normally, with the presence of the deictic word, the noun is demonstrative like â€Å" nay † , â€Å" kia † , â€Å" ay † , aˆÂ ¦ . ( eg: cai tha? ±ng nhoc nay ) . But, in spoken linguistic communication, we frequently see that the demonstratives are omitted, like â€Å" cai tha? ±ng nhoc † .The karyon ( head noun ) :Harmonizing to Dinh Dien ( n.d ) , the karyon ( place ( 0 ) ) may be a noun ( boy, teacher, cat, houseaˆÂ ¦ ) or a combination between a classifier ( danh ta »Ã‚ « cha »Ã¢â‚¬ ° loai ) and the caput noun such as â€Å" con ng? °a »?i † , â€Å" quya »?n sach † , â€Å" may say † . Otherwise, the caput noun may be a classifier followed by a descriptive free word bunch ( ta »Ã¢â‚¬ ¢ ha »?p ta »Ã‚ « ta »Ã‚ ± do mieu ta ) such as â€Å" hai ng? °a »?i A‘ang nga »Ã¢â‚¬Å"i noi chuya »Ã¢â‚¬ ¡n A‘a? ±ng kia † , â€Å" nha »?ng via »Ã¢â‚¬ ¡c ban hom ba »?a † A dditionally, words which are non nouns can besides be the caput due to the talking wont of Vietnamese. For illustration, we can shorten the NP â€Å" hai ca »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœc ca phe A‘en † into the NP â€Å" hai A‘en † . Some Vietnamese classifiers are normally used: caiA : used for most inanimate objects ( cai ban, cai gha , .. ) con: normally for animate beings and kids ( con be ) , but can be used to depict some inanimate objects ( con dao, con A‘? °a »?ng ) bai: used for composings like vocals, drawings, verse forms, essays, etc ( bai th , bai hat, .. ) cay: used for stick-like objects ( cay ph? °a »?ng, cay sung, aˆÂ ¦ ) toa: edifices of authorization: tribunals, halls, â€Å" tusk towers † ( toa nha , .. ) qua/trai: used for ball-shaped objects ( qua chua »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœi, trai A‘at, .. ) quya »?n/cua »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœn: used for book-like objects ( cua »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœn sach, quya »?n tap chi , .. ) ta »? : sheets and other thin objects made of paper ( ta »? giay, ta »? bao, .. ) la : smaller sheets of paper ( la th , la bai, aˆÂ ¦ ) via »Ã¢â‚¬ ¡c: an event or an on-going procedure ( via »Ã¢â‚¬ ¡c kinh doanh, via »Ã¢â‚¬ ¡c ha »?c, aˆÂ ¦ )End elements:Doan et Al. classified the terminal elements in footings of portion of address, construction, manner of connexion, order of some elements. c.1 ) In footings of portion of address: noun la »Ã¢â‚¬ ºp ngoai nga »? verb la »Ã¢â‚¬ ºp giao tiap adjectival la »Ã¢â‚¬ ºp A‘ong central numerical la »Ã¢â‚¬ ºp 4 noun of topographic point la »Ã¢â‚¬ ºp tren la? §u noun of clip la »Ã¢â‚¬ ºp bua »Ã¢â‚¬ ¢i ta »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœi pronoun la »Ã¢â‚¬ ºp ca »Ã‚ §a toi Table 6: The terminal elements in Vietnamese NP in footings of portion of address c.2 ) In footings of construction: A chief – accessary phrase: sach vA?n ha »?c Ma »? A co-ordinated phrase: sach nghe va noi A S-V phrase: sach ma toi va »Ã‚ «a mua c.3 ) In footings of manner of connexion: Direct ways ( eg: tinh tha? §n thep, mat ba »Ã¢â‚¬Å" cauaˆÂ ¦ ) Indirect ways ( eg: ba »Ã¢â€ž ¢ phim ma anh thich, bai viat ma toi va »Ã‚ «a hoan thanh ) c.4 ) In footings of the undermentioned order: The nucleus i? A i? B ( a, B, degree Celsius, vitamin D ) i? CABacillusCgoes with the karyon to organize a phrase ( a compound noun ) describes the features of the object that the karyon mentioned Ex-husband: phong khach ra »Ã¢â€ž ¢ng, ban lam via »Ã¢â‚¬ ¡c American ginseng tra »?ng, aˆÂ ¦ . demonstrative pronouns such as â€Å" nay, ay, A‘o † aˆÂ ¦ a B C vitamin D a noun, a verb or an adjectival â€Å" va »? + noun † or â€Å" ba? ±ng + noun † â€Å" ca »Ã‚ §a + noun † or â€Å" a »Y + noun † Clauses Table 6: The terminal elements in Vietnamese NP in footings of some elements ‘ order. Something about demonstratives may do you misconstruing if we arrange them in different order. For illustration, compare two NPs â€Å" via »Ã¢â‚¬ ¡c ay ca »Ã‚ §a anh † and â€Å" via »Ã¢â‚¬ ¡c ca »Ã‚ §a anh ay † , we can see the difference in significance here due to our talking modulation. In the first NP, if we speak with a level modulation, we can understand it as â€Å" his work † , whereas, if we speak with a raising modulation at â€Å" ay † in the 2nd NP, it can be understood that â€Å" it ‘s your work, non others ‘ work † .Some illustrations:Tat ca nha »?ng cai vay A‘en ba? ±ng denims a »Y store Cass ma ca? ­u( -1 ) ( -2 ) ( -3 ) ( 0 ) ( 1 ) ( ai? bi? ci? vitamin D )th? °a »?ng thay A‘o( 2 )B ) A °a »?ng A‘ua sa »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœ 2 a »Y tr? °a »Ã¢â‚¬ ºc ma? ·t ( Diep, 2000, p. 60 )( 0 ) ( 1 ) ( central numberi? degree Celsius )degree Celsius ) Nha »?ng tha? ±ng nhoc ngha »Ã¢â‚¬ ¹ ch nga »?m ay( -2 ) ( 0 ) ( 1 ) ( adjectival ) ( 2 )vitamin D ) San nha qi ma »Ã¢â‚¬ ºi lau( 0 ) ( 1 ) ( S-V phrase )vitamin E ) Cai cua »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœn tap chi a »Y tren ka »Ã¢â‚¬ ¡ A‘o( -1 ) ( 0 ) ( 1 ) ( degree Celsius ) ( 2 )A comparing of English NP and Vietnamese NPFrom what we discuss above about the NP in English and Vietnamese, we can see that both of them have a basic construction: pre-modification, caput, post-modification. . However, there are still some differences between them. We will discourse some singular similarities and differences in the places of pre-modification and post-modification in English and Vietnamese NP.First, in both English and Vietnamese NP, quantifier, numbers, fractions stand before the caput noun.( a ) All those old chairsQuantifier caput noun( B ) Several thousand peoplenumerical caput noun( degree Celsius ) One-third of my pupilsfraction caput noun( a ) Tat ca nha »?ng cai gha cA © A‘oquantifier caput noun adjectival( B ) V ai ngan ng? °a »?inumerical caput noun( degree Celsius ) Ma »Ã¢â€ž ¢t pha? §n Ba sa »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœ ha »?c sinh ca »Ã‚ §a toifraction caput nounSecond, demonstrative, ordinal Numberss, genitives come before the caput noun in English but after the caput noun in Vietnamese.That big brick housedemonstrative caput nounThe 2nd circuit to Koreaordinal figure caput nounMy favorite spicy nutrientgenitive caput noun( a ) Ngoi nha ba? ±ng gach to la »Ã¢â‚¬ ºn A‘ocaput noun demonstrative( B ) Chuyan du la »Ã¢â‚¬ ¹ch tha »Ã‚ © hai A‘an Han Qua »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœccaput noun ordinal figure( degree Celsius ) Tha »Ã‚ ©c A?n key yeu thich ca »Ã‚ §a toicaput noun genitiveThird, in footings of adjectives, we put them in forepart of the caput noun in English NP but in Vietnamese, we put them after the caput noun.Ex-husband: cai ban mau nau lam ba? ±ng ga »- xoaicaput noun. adjectivesA brown oaken tabular array.adjectives head noun.However, in some instances, adjectives come a fter the caput noun in English NP such as â€Å" something unusual † , â€Å" person brave † , aˆÂ ¦ Additionally, the order of adjectives qualifiers in English is instead fixed ( name, size, form, age, coloring material, beginning, substance, present participial ) whereas that in Vietnamese NP may be exchanged, based on the talker ‘s attending. For illustration, in English, we merely have merely one order â€Å" a reasonably bluish skirt † but when we say in Vietnamese, there are 2 ways â€Å" ma »Ã¢â€ž ¢t chiac vay mau xanh district attorney tra »?i xinh xan † and â€Å" ma »Ã¢â€ž ¢t chiac vay xinh xan mau xanh district attorney tra »?i † . Furthermore, in English NP, the happening of nouns and clinchers is obligatory but optional in Vietnamese NP. So, if we translate the phrase â€Å" cua »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœn sach tren ban † into Vietnamese, it will be â€Å" book on tabular array † . Is it right? As you see, the true phrase should be â€Å" the book on the tabular array † . In Vietnamese, classifiers are by and large obligatory in numerated NP whereas in English, we do n't usually utilize classifiers before nouns, except some particular words â€Å" a brace of places † , â€Å" a loaf of staff of life † aˆÂ ¦ . Ex-husband: In English, we say â€Å" two books † but in Vietnamese, we say â€Å" hai cua »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœn sach † . The following difference I want to advert is the place of noun qualifiers. In English NP, they come before a caput noun but in Vietnamese, they come after the caput noun. Nevertheless, in some instances in Vietnamese, noun qualifiers precedes the caput noun ( eg ma »Ã¢â€ž ¢t thi nhan, ma »Ã¢â€ž ¢t ca »? tha »Ã‚ § , .. ) A concert dance category A bundle circuit A summer run ( a ) Ma »Ã¢â€ž ¢t la »Ã¢â‚¬ ºp Ba le ( B ) Chuyan du la »Ã¢â‚¬ ¹ch tra »?n goi ( degree Celsius ) chian da »Ã¢â‚¬ ¹ch mua he Last but non least, sometimes there are some equivocal constructions that cause us baffled. In Vietnamese, what comes into people ‘s head foremost is spoken foremost is the common regulation, which is besides a natural order of people ‘s thought ( Dinh, n.d, p. 11 ) . Let ‘s take a NP as an illustration. How many ways you can state the English NP â€Å" a new Korean leather coat † ? We have â€Å" ma »Ã¢â€ž ¢t cai ao khoac ma »Ã¢â‚¬ ºi ba? ±ng long thu ca »Ã‚ §a Han Qua »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœc † or â€Å" ma »Ã¢â€ž ¢t cai ao khoac Han Qua »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœc ba? ±ng long thu ma »Ã¢â‚¬ ºi † and â€Å" ma »Ã¢â€ž ¢t cai ao khoac ba? ±ng long thu Han Qua »Ã¢â‚¬Ëœc ma »Ã¢â‚¬ ºi † . It seems that in the English NP, the place of pre-modifiers and post-premodifiers are non so free and flexible as that in Vietnamese NPDeduction in English instruction and acquisitionLearners of English may hold some troubles such as how to interpret from English into Vietnamese and frailty versa due to the differences in the place of pre-modifiers and post-modifiers we have merely mentioned above ( for illustration: ma »Ã¢â€ž ¢t quya »?n sach hay – a book good or a book interesting. They may besides be in problem with the order of the adjectives in a instead long noun phrase with many adjectives. Which adjective come foremost? Which one will come next? Where should we set those adjectives. Vietnamese pupils may happen it hard to retrieve all the places due to the wont of puting the adjectives after the caput noun and utilizing them flexibly. Knowing clearly about English NP and Vietnamese NP, particularly the differences every bit good as the common errors that Vietnamese scholars frequently meet will assist the instructors guide their pupils right. In other words, scholars can cognize their errors from the beginning so that they can happen it easy to larn English subsequently, particularly grammar. Based on the cognition of English NP and Vietnamese NP, the instructors besides design the undertakings for pupils to consolidate and pattern cognition of phrases and sentences in both two linguistic communications.DecisionIn decision, although NP in English and Vietnamese has the same basic construction ( pre-modification, caput, post-modification ) , they are non the same in the word order of pre-modification and post-modification. These differences are caused by the unsimilarity in thought and talking wont of English and Vietnamese. As a pupil every bit good as a teacher-to-be, this research helps me a batch. When making t his assignment, I have a opportunity to consolidate my cognition of both English and Vietnamese and cognize something new and helpful. With what I learn from this research, I will use to my survey and learning calling.

Laozi and Dao Essay

1, Superficially understanding Laozi’s ideas, â€Å"those who know do not talk; / those who talk do not know† (56), are a bit conventional during his period time. It seems like that sages should try to follow the path of solitary, pretending to be ignorant and hide their talents to stay out of troubles. But we should think much deeper because Laozi’s wisdom is extremely profound that it is difficult for us to understand it. I think that â€Å"those who know do not talk;/ those who talk do not know† means that sage does not need to show off their talents. In Laozi, if a person is true erudite or intelligent, he himself will unify with what he learns and understands; I mean that everything a sage does can show how wise he is—a sage himself is wisdom itself. Laozi himself focuses more on how to live as an erudite person, act as an erudite person rather than talk as an erudite person. Related to Chinese tradition, Laozi prefers people who are humble and low-key but not ostentatious and hard-edged. So, Laozi writes about Dao instead of talking it; he believes that Dao itself is the truth which truly exists and does not need to be publicized by preaching. 2ï ¼Å'Confucius’ ideas of Dao focus more on ourselves, but Laozi’s Dao is more receptive, including the rules of everything in the universe. â€Å"An educated gentleman cannot but be resolute and broad—minded, for he has taken up a heavy responsibility and a long course. Is it not a heavy responsibility which is to practice benevolence? Is it not a long course, which will end only with his death?† (The Analects). Confucius thinks that no matter how difficult it is, man can make their will the will of the universe if they perform in the right ritual; that is the reason why Chinese emperor Wu (one of the most ambitious and powerful emperors in Chinese history) of Han dynasty decides to confucianize the whole China. Unlike Confucius, Laozi thinks that Dao decides what is possible and what is impossible, maybe possible can become impossible, but it should follow the rules of Dao; human being cannot force the impossible become possible. The biggest difference between Laozi and Confucius is that Confucius knows the past, now, but he does not know future, so everyone need to struggle now for future; Laozi  knows past, now and future because he knows that everything follows the Dao so he prefers that everyone should enjoys now and does not worry about future because it has already been decided by Dao.

Project Management Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Project Management - Term Paper Example There is a specified objective of completing the task within 20 days. This is 15 days shy of the existing 35 days within which projects are normally completed. The most fundamental technique to use in achieving the set goal is to eliminate all forms of waste associated with production. There is an estimated cost of 500,000 usd investment fund. There is a very highly taunted objective of improving quality of engines to be produced through a performance analysis process. This is a linear project management process Project Management Institute (2008).. There are however rooms made for handling changes in the scope of the project. The contract shall permit changes to be made in relation to labor issues such as employing new staff to continue from where existing staff exit. There shall also be the introduction of new fund of not more than 25% of the original estimate if the need to pump in more funds arises. It is assumed that should the project be closely delivered according to the objective and target of reducing waste, the company would accumulate more revenue than expected. This is because more pieces of engines can be built with the current budget and more quality engines can be produced within the set time frame (PM Docs,

Human Relations Case Study Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Human Relations Case Study - Essay Example Introduction: Organizations are very important in the day to day life. One of the most basic and fundamental aspects of organizations is that it involves human resources. The word â€Å"organization† comes from the word â€Å"organize†. This word suggests a sense of order and management of human resources to bring about or achieve an intended result. Literature review Management is an umbrella word. It means controlling and harmonizing resources so that the organization can achieve its goals and targets. The word management clearly points to leadership of the organization. This is where the human resource begins. Leadership determines the quality of the organization almost directly. This is because it is charged with the responsibility of coming up with decisions that shall lift the quality of the organization. Poor leadership leads to unnecessary mistakes which end up in costing the organization a lot of resources. The quality of leadership is reflected through the org anizational leadership structure. Under the leadership structure various managers are assigned with different responsibilities which are viewed as pillars to the organization. This is to make sure that the growth of an organization is all round and evenly distributed. ... This includes coming up with the required standard of qualifications of the prospective workers. This also includes developing skills through training and creation of incentives. The aim of these activities is to come up with a strong workforce that shall work with high level of professionalism. The reward system of the organization is one of the most sensitive areas to the workers. This is because it can nurture talent or even demoralize the workers. This department does not exclude dealing with the cases of indiscipline among workers. In some large organizations, the human resource department is divided into many other smaller departments. These departments deal with specific matters within the organization. While still having a look at the human resource department of an organization, there are times when highly trained workers become involved in cases of indiscipline. These manifest in multiple ways. Some workers are fond of over drinking. This causes many of them to come to work when they are drunk. To illustrate this, our case involves a management trainee called Gary. Although he has full potential, he is not able to be fully helpful to the organization because of his drinking habit. Those who know Gary when he was studying at the university, say he was used to drinking a little too much. He was always late for classes and sometimes never showed up for classes at all. When called upon to be accountable, he had convincing excuses that left the lecturers and other concerned people with satisfaction. Somehow, that was able to cushion him from trouble as long as he was a student. However, when he joined the professional field as a management trainee, he initially thought the same excuses would work in the new work place. However, his bosses became

Eva Bellin argues that democratic transition can be carried out Essay

Eva Bellin argues that democratic transition can be carried out successfully when the state's coercive apparatus [security - Essay Example The dissatisfaction may rise to violence but if the state’s coercive apparatus, which is Military and Police, is willing to suppress the revolutionaries, the system still can have the chances of survival even among hazards though illegitimately (Skocpol, 1979). The same rule applies to the democratic transition which is, in a sense, a revolution which the state’s powerful apparatus tries to stop from taking effect (Skocpol, 1979). For example in Middle East, what hinders democracy is the strong authoritarianism systematically helped by the military (Bellin, 2004). The powerful military has the illegitimate will to resist democratic transition in Middle East. Coercive apparatus sometimes couples with the civilian leadership for example in Egypt and Syria. Here the leadership is civilian however no true democratic transition can occur. The reason is simple; civilian leadership and military go hand in hand for the joint interests and against the joint threat. They control the state mutually and the share in authority is so systematically equaled that none can go against the other. Both of them are patrimonially linked to each other (Bellin, 2004). For the state’s coercive apparatus to permit the society to experience democratic transition, there are many factors which play the pivotal role. Economy is one such factor. The stronger is the economy of a state, the less are the chances of democratization to emerge and succeed. Analytics of the history reveal that whenever the economy went down and the coercive apparatus got less money from the regime, misunderstandings developed between the state and military. With consistency in the downfall of the economy, the misunderstandings took the aggravated shape. The crises benefitted the democratic powers to struggle for the transition. Politicians struggled with no fear as the military had its own problems. They stood successful in their mission (Bellin, 2004). The international support for a regime de cides the fate of democratic transition. The situation in such cases demands honesty to be shown by the international community. When the coercive regimes lose their international support, they are encountered with many issues. The aggravating situations require immediate replacement and democracy comes up with the most feasible solution. The coercive apparatus has to welcome the democratic transition. They are forced to do so because the absence of international support results in the downfall of the economy (Bellin, 2004). The strength of coercive apparatus lies in its institutionalization. The more is the apparatus institutionalized, the less will it have the will to conquer the political borders. The less is the coercive apparatus institutionalized, the more will it have the will to resist the democratic transition. Institutionalization in coercive apparatus refers to the norms inside it. If the apparatus is systematically administered by the use of rules, principles and merit, it is called to be institutionalized. Here recruitment is based on merit and promotion on performance not political affiliation. Discipline is a sort of ethics in the domain (Huntington, 1991). Contrary to this, coercive apparatus is said to be less institutionalized if there is no obeying of rules and principles in the proper understanding of the terms. Promotion is hierarchical and